Game applications cannot leak memory. If an application leaks even a small amount of memory, it eventually dies.

I say preach it, brother. I can think of a couple of titles where memory leaks actually hurt a game’s sales. In fact I’ve been known to blame reckless use of new for the death of entire studios. malloc() — there’s no evil too great to lay at its feet.

Paul’s sentence comes in the context of a group of justifications for EA building its own Standard Template Library, which are so concisely spot-on that I’ll reproduce them here. Call them Paul’s Commandments:

• No matter how powerful any game computer ever gets, it will never have any free memory or CPU cycles.
• Game developers are very concerned about software performance and software development practices.
• Game software often doesn’t use conventional synchronous disk IO such as <stdio.h> or <fstream> but uses asynchronous IO.
• Game applications cannot leak memory. If an application leaks even a small amount of memory, it eventually dies.
• Every byte of allocated memory must be accounted for and trackable. This is partly to assist in leak detection but is also to enforce budgeting.
• Game software rarely uses system-provided heaps but uses custom heaps instead.
• A lot of effort is expended in reducing memory fragmentation.
• A lot of effort is expended in creating memory analysis tools and debugging heaps.
• A lot of effort is expended in improving source and data build times.
• Application code and libraries cannot be very slow in debug builds.
• Memory allocation of any type is avoided to the extent possible.
• Operator new overrides (class and global) are the rule and not the exception.
• Use of built-in global operator new is verboten, at least with shareable libraries.
• Any memory a library allocates must be controllable by the user.
• Game software must be savvy to non-default memory alignment requirements.
• Memory pools are sometimes used in order to avoid fragmentation, even though they necessarily waste some memory themselves.
• Branching (if/else/while/for/do) is avoided to the extent possible, especially mispredicted branches.
• Virtual functions are avoided to the extent possible, especially in bottleneck code.
• Exception handling is usually disabled.
  
• RTTI is usually disabled or at least unused in shipping code.

You can find the whole article here; it’s a worthwhile read. If you’re in a hurry, you can safely skip the large tables; the meat of the article is in “Motivation” and the sections following “Game Software Issues“.